Abstract: |
Three longstanding and pervasive myths of wildland fire management are identified and explained using a basic application of economic theory. Each myth is explained and the collection of myths is examined to identify a common misapplication of the theory that ties them together. The myths examined are: - Fuels treatment reduces optimal suppression expenditures (including initial attack)
- Minimizing the C+NVC bowl provides an optimal solution
- High initial attack success rates are preferable to low rates of success
By correctly applying microeconomics, the user can easily avoid the confusions in policy and management promulgated by these common misperceptions. Correct applications of microeconomic theory can promote better wildland fire policy, avoid misperceptions, and lead to an improved development of fire management programs. |
